当前币圈OTC业务面临的犯罪风险

目前，交易所OTC是币圈投资者存取款的主要渠道。

2017年《9月4日公告》发布前，投资者直接将法币转入交易所账户购买比特币等虚拟货币。

《9月4号公告》发布后，国家加大了对行业的监管力度，交易所的OTC业务因此而衍生。

交易所不再接受用户的法币，而是成为类似淘宝的平台，只提供OTC买卖订单信息。

协助用户与商户进行存取款交易，整个过程交易所不收取任何费用。

但随着USDT等虚拟货币的普及以及自身优势，越来越多的黑灰行业利用虚拟货币作为洗钱、电子诈骗等违法犯罪活动的媒介工具。

交易所OTC已成为币圈最大的犯罪风险。

商业。

近日，最高人民检察院和国家外汇管理局联合发布的惩治外汇犯罪典型案例中，就有两起涉及币圈OTC业务的案件。

下面，笔者将结合案例分析币圈OTC业务存在的法律风险。

交易所OTC业务逻辑

在分析法律风险之前，首先需要了解交易所OTC的业务逻辑。

从下图可以清楚地看出，整个OTC业务的两方分别是用户和OTC商户。

交易所作为平台，提供交易撮合，保障交易安全，用户和商户在平台内获取交易订单信息，并通过银行卡、支付宝、微信等渠道进行异地转账。

交易标的USDT等虚拟货币相当于从平台上的一个账户转账到另一个账户。

中间。

这种交易模式如何涉及违法犯罪活动？

涉及币圈OTC业务的非法经营犯罪

最高人民检察院和国家外汇管理局公布的两起涉货币典型案件均涉及非法经营罪。

Article 225 of the Criminal Law stipulates that the crime of illegal business operations refers to violating state regulations and committing one of the following illegal business activities, disrupting market order, and if the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than five years or criminal detention, and concurrently or solely A fine of not less than one time but not more than five times the illegal income shall be imposed; if the circumstances are particularly serious, the person shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years and shall also be fined not less than one time but not more than five times the illegal income or property shall be confiscated:

(1) Operating franchises, monopoly items or other restricted items as prescribed by laws and administrative regulations without permission;

(2) Buying and selling import and export licenses, import and export certificates of origin, and other business licenses or approval documents stipulated in laws and administrative regulations;

(3) Illegally operating securities, futures, and insurance businesses without approval from the relevant state authorities, or illegally engaging in fund payment and settlement business;

(4) Other illegal business activities that seriously disrupt market order.

The legal interest protected by the crime of illegal business operations is market order. Article 96 of the Criminal Law stipulates that violation of state regulations refers to violation of laws and decisions formulated by the National People's Congress and its Standing Committee, administrative regulations, prescribed administrative measures, and decisions and orders issued by the State Council. At present, industry regulatory documents such as the September 4th Announcement and the September 24th Notice issued by the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the People's Bank of China and other ministries and commissions do not fall under national regulations.

措施

Regarding the behavior of "illegal engagement in fund payment and settlement business" in paragraph 3, Article 1 of the "Interpretations on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases of Illegal Engagement in Fund Payment and Settlement Business and Illegal Trading of Foreign Exchange" stipulates that violations of national regulations include the following: One of the circumstances falls under "illegal engagement in fund payment and settlement business" as stipulated in Article 225, Paragraph 3 of the Criminal Law:

(1) Using acceptance terminals or online payment interfaces to pay monetary funds to designated payers in illegal ways such as fictitious transactions, false prices, transaction refunds, etc.;

(2) Illegally providing others with cash-out services from the company's bank settlement account or transfer of services from the company's bank settlement account to personal accounts;

(3) Illegally providing check cashing services to others;

(4) Other situations of illegally engaging in fund payment and settlement business.

In an article published by the Shanghai Rule of Law News, the prosecutor of Pudong New Area believed that accepting other people’s funds through accounts under actual control, and then realizing the exchange of virtual currency and legal currency according to customer order requirements, and making profits from it, acting as an "intermediary", such as The use of mainstream virtual currencies such as Bitcoin and Tether as stable currencies to achieve cross-border payment and settlement of fiat currencies violates the relevant provisions of the Commercial Bank Law and endangers the order and security of the payment market. It falls under Article 1, 4 of the above-mentioned "Interpretation" In the case of "other illegal activities of fund payment and settlement business" mentioned in the paragraph, the person may be convicted and punished for the crime of illegal business operation.

However, the author believes that users and OTC merchants complete the purchase and sale of USDT through the transaction matching information provided by the exchange, thereby making virtual currency investments. Virtual currencies such as USDT and BTC are virtual commodities, which are essentially equivalent to users purchasing goods on platforms such as Taobao and Pinduoduo. In this process, the RMB between buyers and sellers is transferred through bank cards, Alipay, WeChat and other channels outside the platform, while the purchased virtual commodities such as USDT and BTC are transferred from the seller's platform account to the buyer's account. Regarding this behavior, the author It is believed that it should not be regarded as illegally engaged in fund payment and settlement business in illegal operations.

Article 2 of the "Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in the Handling of Criminal Cases of Illegal Fund Payment and Settlement Business and Illegal Foreign Exchange Trading" stipulates that in violation of national regulations, illegal foreign exchange trading activities such as buying and selling foreign exchange or buying and selling foreign exchange in disguised form are carried out, disrupting the order of the financial market, and the circumstances are In serious cases, in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 4 of Article 225 of the Criminal Law, the offender shall be convicted and punished for the crime of illegal business operation.

Although stablecoins such as USDT and USDC are pegged to the U.S. dollar and are minted and issued through the issuer's collateral in the bank, stablecoins cannot be equated with foreign exchange.

Article 3 of the "Foreign Exchange Management Regulations" gives a clear definition of foreign exchange. Foreign exchange refers to the following means of payment and assets expressed in foreign currencies that can be used for international settlements:

(1) Foreign currency cash, including banknotes and coins;

(2) Foreign currency payment vouchers or payment instruments, including bills, bank deposit vouchers, bank cards, etc.;

(3) Foreign currency securities, including bonds, stocks, etc.;

(4) Special drawing rights;

(5) Other foreign exchange assets.

The "Notice on Preventing Bitcoin Risks" issued by the People's Bank of China and other five ministries and commissions clarified that Bitcoin is not issued by the monetary authority, does not have legal and compulsory monetary attributes, and is not a real currency, but a currency. Specific virtual goods.

Jurisprudence in some judicial practices also clarifies that virtual currency is a virtual commodity. Buying and selling virtual currency through RMB is equivalent to buying and selling virtual goods. After investors obtain investment income, they withdraw the virtual currency and exchange it back for RMB. There is no foreign exchange purchase or sale in the entire process and evasion of foreign exchange supervision. Therefore, it should not constitute illegal foreign exchange trading.

Typical cases constituting the crime of illegal business operations

Although stablecoins such as USDT and USDC are not foreign exchange, in two typical cases involving the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, the perpetrators committed illegal business crimes for buying and selling foreign exchange in disguised form. Why is this?

First, let’s sort out the OTC business processes of these two cases.

Typical case 1: Illegal business case of Zhao and others

From the picture above, you can see that Zhao's team collects dirham cash from customers in Dubai, then pays RMB to the customer's domestic account, and then uses virtual currency as a medium to realize the return of funds in the form of "Dirham-USDT-RMB" , which is equivalent to using virtual currency as an intermediary tool to realize the exchange of foreign exchange and RMB, which is a disguised purchase and sale of foreign exchange, and will ultimately be held criminally responsible for the crime of illegal business operations.

Typical Case 2: Case of Guo Mouzhao and others illegally operating and assisting information network criminal activities

In Case 2, the customer places an order through the payment platform and pays foreign currency to an overseas account controlled by the platform. The platform uses the foreign currency to purchase USDT, which is converted into RMB through OTC merchants using illegal channels and transferred to the domestic account designated by the customer. The payment exchange platform also uses As an intermediary tool, USDT helps customers bypass national foreign exchange supervision and indirectly realize the exchange of foreign currencies and RMB, which is a disguised purchase and sale of foreign exchange.

The above-mentioned typical cases are the same as the huge underground bank case uncovered by the police in Qingdao, Shandong some time ago. Criminal gangs use virtual currency as a medium for foreign currency and RMB exchange to evade state supervision of foreign exchange and transfer funds for various upstream criminal and money laundering teams. Convertibility poses a major threat to the social and economic order and national financial security.

In addition, it can be seen that in several cases, the public security organs cooperated with the foreign exchange management department, and used third-party technology companies to assist in investigating on-chain transaction records, comparing on-chain wallet transaction records with off-chain bank account flows, and fixing the entire illegal exchange. This also reflects the regulatory authorities’ thinking on cracking down on virtual currency OTC businesses.

Summary and suggestions

To sum up, the author suggests that some entrepreneurial projects under the banner of cross-border payment and payment platforms that support the recharge of virtual currencies such as USDT need to carefully evaluate their own business.

If we assist or support users to open various foreign currency debit cards and prepaid cards, users can deposit USDT using RMB, and then exchange it for foreign currency on the platform for payment and consumption. The entire transaction process will realize the exchange of RMB-USDT-foreign currency.

This behavior is the same as the above-mentioned typical cases. It uses virtual currency as a media tool to evade foreign exchange supervision. It is very likely to be suspected of buying and selling foreign exchange in disguise, constituting the crime of illegal business operations.

Moreover, since these platforms support on-chain recharge of virtual currencies, they need to carry out anti-money laundering compliance reviews on the chain. They use the KYT on-chain fund review tool to provide advance warning for the virtual currencies flowing into the platform and trace their origins afterwards to avoid suspicion to the greatest extent. The illegal and criminal gangsters flow into the platform, increasing the criminal risk of the platform.

标签：OTC 业务 币圈 风险